FBI Raids: Pertinent or Paranoid?

The FBI recently raided the New Mexico office of the controversial local alt-right news outlet "The Free Thought Project", seizing an estimated 3 TB worth of data. The raid comes at a time when concerns about perceived political bias in mainstream media outlets and tech giants like Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube are high. Most recently, Facebook has been censoring both left and right wing content from their platform, along with "alleged" hate speech. YouTube has had a similar track record, albeit to a lesser degree. Some companies have expanded their censorship efforts in recent years to include 'conspiracy theories', which can be loosely described as questioning the official story on events like 9/11, Sandy Hook or the JFK assassination. The FBI's most recent raid, however, is different than previous operations against alternative media outlets such as InfoWars.com and James Corbett's Press For Truth, who merely had their bank accounts frozen without any physical raids taking place. The FBI also didn't charge the owner of "The Free Thought Project" with tax evasion, which was the case for James Corbett. Instead, the FBI confiscated all of his equipment including his work and personal laptops and even his cell phone. This clearly isn't a simple case of an alternative news outlet not paying taxes. The FBI's actions seem to be motivated by something deeper and more nefarious as they are willing to spend a large amount of manpower and resources on raiding the personal property of a journalist, who isn't even being accused of breaking the law. While it is possible that "The Free Thought Project" may have been using a bogus social security number or not paying taxes for their employees, which would give the FBI reasonable cause for a raid, this does not appear to be the case in this instance.

We Are Change has reached out to "The Free Thought Project" for comment but have not received a response at this time. Republished with permission from We Are Change .

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This material is intended to aid you in your education and provide knowledge in accordance with your goals and interests.

Posted by Liberty Under Attack at 8:55 AM No comments:

The FBI and DOJ have been caught red handed lying to the American people on more than one occasion before they expose the truth behind what they are doing. Lets begin with the story of "Anwar Al-Awlaki." Anwar al-Awlaki was an American citizen who was born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents. He was a member of Al-Qaeda, but he never took up arms against our country. Even though I am mad and upset that he killed so many Americans, we have to give some credit where credit is due. This endeared him to the American public and gave him more of a presence in jihadist circles in America than if he had been killed in Afghanistan by US armed forces. He helped recruit Americans to fight for Al-Qaeda on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, just read his speeches and you will see what I mean about how effective his influence is. It is believed that he personally recruited 15-20 plus Americans for Al-Qaeda to fight in the Middle East, but it is also believed that he never took up arms against the United States of America. That was until his final days when Awlaki was actively planning a terrorist plot to bring down a plane on Christmas Day by recruiting and training an American underwear bomber to do the dirty work. The underwear bomber, who didn't actually have explosives in his underpants by the way, boarded a plane in Amsterdam and attempted to detonate his bomb. The bomb fizzled because it didn't have anything inside of it, so we can thank God for that. Awlaki is still alive and well at the moment, but there are reports that he has been killed in Yemen. We will just have to wait and see what happens when we take another trip to that country, because they will be celebrating his death. Now its time for a little history lesson. The government regularly lies about the Non-Aggression Principle. Most of you know this but there are a few people who don't, so they need to brush up on their UCC knowledge. First of all, we need to look at how we got here. This scenario is based on reports from individuals with direct knowledge of what is going on in the world and from the governments themselves. I will be using the term "Muslim" for the sake of simplicity and to keep it as accurate as possible. The "Muslim" countries listed here are not necessarily Muslim countries, but this is where most of the evidence points now. For those who don't know what a UCC is, its an agreement that has been made between two (or more) parties to not use violence against each other. Joining the coalition could be the only way to stop the potential genocide that they have planned against us all. If you can't figure out why I would do this in a blog post, then I suggest you read all of my posts on Facebook and Twitter that discuss these issues in much greater detail. Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia is the only country that needs to be "Muslim" to be included on this list. It is currently ruled by a king, who is also the head of the Muslim Council of America and the Chief Justice of its Supreme Court. He has served as chief justice since 2008, and he has been chairman since 2005. Saudi Arabia is a key ally of American interests in the Middle East, but they are not part of the current coalition against ISIS right now. They have stated multiple times that they will only join if we stop supporting Israel and they ask us to fight against Israel as well. Israel is also not part of this coalition at all, so there would be nothing stopping them from attacking Americans if it fit their needs. Saudi Arabia is the primary source of jihadist funding for ISIS. Saudi Arabia was in favor of the Al-Qaeda group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which is an offshoot from al-Qaeda. Saudi Arabian officials expressed opposition to ISIS's method of uniting terrorist groups under its umbrella and rejected foreign fighters entering into Syria without coordinating with the Syrian army. Saudi Arabia has been on record supporting both Sunni and Shia Muslim terrorism inside of Syria. They have stated on record that they will do whatever it takes to ensure that Iran is not successful in their attacks against their country.

Conclusion:

Saudi Arabia has more than enough money to fund ISIS and is actively working to undermine our country in any way they can. They are Sunni Muslims, who are against Shia Muslims. They do not want to stop until they have killed all of the Shia in the world and forced them into submission as second class citizens. These two groups of Muslim people don't' get along very well with each other and neither group wants to live under Sharia Law, but their time is running out so they must choose between living under Sharia Law or dying under Jihad. Let's begin by looking at the demographic makeup of Saudi Arabia, because it makes a huge difference on how we deal with them.